Published by Railfuture
Railwatch is the quarterly magazine of Railfuture, which is free to members.
Railwatch 075 - April 1998
Fighting for rail on all fronts
RDS officers have been making repeated forays into the corridors of power with the aim of improving current rail services and ensuring that rail takes a key role in the new transport era.
Following a meeting with Transport Minister Glenda Jackson in the summer, we have concentrated on officials.
One team - Paul Clark, Bill Collins and Jeremy Sleightholm - met officials from the Franchise Director's office in December just after the Government gave the Franchise Director new objectives which include helping disabled travellers, reducing congestion and tougher monitoring of rail operators.
We discussed these issues as well as experimental rail services, and services run jointly by train operators. We also raised the provision of bus links in place of trains, such as the coach link from Lincoln to Newark which competes with Central Trains.
Our next port of call was the Rail Regulator in January and this time the RDS team included John Bigny, Bill Collins, Peter Lawrence and James Towler.
We stressed the need for Railtrack to invest more in "minor works" and voiced concerns about poor maintenance in certain areas of the country. We also raised the thorny question of investment in new rail routes.
Other topics included the national rail enquiry service and stressed that although official statistics showed that performance was improving, complaints were actually increasing, particularly about the quality of information on offer.
In February, Michael Caton, David Bigg, Ray King and Nat Taplin went to see Railtrack. They had a wide-ranging discussion with passenger director Brian Burdsall and Paul Molyneux, head of product development.
We were told the new Network Management Statement was due out on 25 March and would contain a great deal more detail and information about Railtrack's plans.
We raised a host of issues, including East-West links, the West Coast main line and former branch lines threatened by busways. Luton-Dunstable and Cambridge-St Ives were used as examples.
Note: contact details (postal and email addresses, along with telephone numbers) in old editions of Railwatch out of date. Click CONTACT US for latest contact details.
Railfuture is an independent, voluntary group representing rail users in Britain with 20,000 affiliated and individual members. It is not funded by train companies, political parties or trade unions, and all members have an equal say.
Railfuture campaigns for cheap and convenient rail services for everyone; better links for buses, bikes and pedestrians; policies to get more heavy lorries on to rail; new lines, stations and freight terminals. In short, a better rail service and a bigger rail system for both passengers and freight.
Railfuture is pro-rail but not anti-road or anti-air. However, we campaign for a switch from road and air to rail. We do not interfere in the running of the railway - we campaign for the quality and range of services provided, not how they are delivered. We are the only champion of all rail users.
Railfuture is the campaigning name of Railfuture Ltd.
A not-for-profit Company Limited by Guarantee.
Registered in England and Wales No. 05011634.
Registered Office: Edinburgh House, 1-5 Bellevue Road, Clevedon, North Somerset BS21 7NP (for legal correspondence only).
All other correspondence to 24 Chedworth Place, Tattingstone, Suffolk IP9 2ND
© Copyright Railfuture Ltd 2021.
Railfuture is happy for extracts to be used by journalists, researchers and students. We would, however, appreciate a mention of Railfuture in any article, website or programme. Except with Railfuture's express written permission, no one should distribute or commercially exploit the content.
Privacy StatementClick Privacy to read Railfuture's GDPR statement on how we treat your data.
This site does not use its own cookies, although Google Analytics does. The site is maintained for Railfuture by Billing Specialists Ltd.