Railwatch

Published by Railfuture

Railwatch is the quarterly magazine of Railfuture, which is free to members.

Non-members can subscribe to Railwatch, receiving it by post, by clicking


Railwatch 074 - December 1997

A share of the action

By Henry Law

Railways, it is said, can never make a "profit", and the argument goes, they have to be "subsidised" out of public funds, which is considered worthwhile on account of the wider social benefits which the railway operation achieves.

Are these wider benefits some vague feeling of well-being that spreads around the community, or are they more tangible? Is it possible to put a figure on the external (other than from fares) value generated by a railway?

The answer is to be found in, among other places, the windows of estate agents and the pages of the property press. It is plain that land values are heavily influenced by the availability of transport facilities.

Property advertisements invariably emphasise the advantages of the location in terms of road and rail access and sometimes proximity to facilities such as docks and airports. shopping centres and so on. If a new bus route or railway station is opened or an old one closed, this will affect a prospective occupant's willingness to buy or lease, and therefore its market value. Some transport operations, of course, may have an adverse effect because of noise nuisance and disturbance.

Thus, the external benefits of the railway operation largely turn up in the form of enhanced land values. The Victoria Line, built in the 1960s, made Islington a desirable place to live, with land values to match, and we can see the same thing now in areas served by the London's Jubilee Line extension.

Inaccessible neighbourhoods will soon become just 15 minutes away from town, and land values in places like Bermondsey and Southwark have risen in anticipation of this change in the transport map. Thus, a large part of the return on the investment has passed to landowners rather than to the community which has paid for it.

Options proposed to deal with this issue include payroll taxes and a business rate supplement. But payroll taxes encourage employers to get rid of their staff, while a business rate supplement would be little better, because with the rate in its present form, anyone who replaces an obsolete building by a modern structure has to pay more, while owners who take the roofs off their properties pay nothing, thereby promoting dereliction and unemployment. There is, however, another form of property tax, which would be highly effective as a means of capturing the external benefits generated by any form of infrastructure investment.

Under this scheme, the present council tax and business rate would be replaced by a tax based on land values. The enhanced land values due to the infrastructure improvements would then be reflected in the higher assessments and tax payable, but development and improvement would not be penalised. The public investment would be recouped in the form of higher tax revenues, thereby creating a pool of funds for further investment.

If you would like to know more about this subject, you can find it on the web site http://www.landvaluetax.org/.

Note: contact details (postal and email addresses, along with telephone numbers) in old editions of Railwatch out of date. Click CONTACT US for latest contact details.


[Issue 74 Index]

[Railwatch Home] [Prev Issue (73)] [Railwatch Issues] [RIS Progress Reports] [Next Issue (75)] [Railfuture Home]


Railfuture is an independent, voluntary group representing rail users in Britain with 20,000 affiliated and individual members. It is not funded by train companies, political parties or trade unions, and all members have an equal say.

Railfuture campaigns for cheap and convenient rail services for everyone; better links for buses, bikes and pedestrians; policies to get more heavy lorries on to rail; new lines, stations and freight terminals. In short, a better rail service and a bigger rail system for both passengers and freight.

Railfuture is pro-rail but not anti-road or anti-air. However, we campaign for a switch from road and air to rail. We do not interfere in the running of the railway - we campaign for the quality and range of services provided, not how they are delivered. We are the only champion of all rail users.


Railfuture is the campaigning name of Railfuture Ltd.

A not-for-profit Company Limited by Guarantee.

Registered in England and Wales No. 05011634.

Registered Office: Edinburgh House, 1-5 Bellevue Road, Clevedon, North Somerset BS21 7NP (for legal correspondence only).

All other correspondence to 24 Chedworth Place, Tattingstone, Suffolk IP9 2ND


© Copyright Railfuture Ltd 2021.

Railfuture is happy for extracts to be used by journalists, researchers and students. We would, however, appreciate a mention of Railfuture in any article, website or programme. Except with Railfuture's express written permission, no one should distribute or commercially exploit the content.


Privacy Statement

Click Privacy to read Railfuture's GDPR statement on how we treat your data.

25.08.2020

This site does not use its own cookies, although Google Analytics does. The site is maintained for Railfuture by Billing Specialists Ltd.